More critical than organising data is understanding the data collected. Let’s say you want to find out how well your friend does on a survey. Then you go to your instructor and ask to see his letter, but he tells you he can’t offer you the response sheet and can give you the grades. As a result, the instructor informs you of the subject’s grades, which you record and give to your mate. When on the way, you find that your buddy has earned the same grades as you. Is this a coincidence? What occurred here was that the instructor told you your own grades, thinking you were there to double-check them. As a result, the whole data set you just gathered is incorrect. And if you have a chart of marks with you, that is not the information you were looking for. When dealing with evidence, it’s essential to understand that the same data is being gathered in the first place.
It was previously stated that data must be interpreted in an ordered and contextual way to be useful to us. As a result, the significance of data organisation cannot be overstated.
You’ve already come through the classic yellow pages. These massive books included the name and phone number of any person who lived in a given area. And if it was a huge metropolis, thousands of people’s names and phone numbers were in that book. So, if you’re visiting a city you’ve never been to before and want to see a buddy you know lives there, all you have to do is look at the yellow pages for his name and phone number. Isn’t it a lifesaver if you get lost?
Don’t you need a lot of numbers from a lot of people to create such a book? The receiving of numbers is the simple part. If you send a group of people around town asking for people’s phone numbers, you’ll quickly amass a large amount of information. For this data to be usable, it must be organised in a way that makes finding easier. The names in the yellow pages are alphabetically organised, so if you know a word, you can look it up much as you might in a dictionary.